Incontinence and urethral growth due to a rival in the territory
Report and analysis according to the system of the 5 Biological Laws of Nature (5BL, New Medicine, GNM, German New Medicine).
| Diagnoses | ![]() Report by: Bekannte, Freunde ... |
|||||
| The report is about | Me | |||||
| Gender | Female | |||||
| Age | ||||||
| Handedness | Right | |||||
| Additional methods | ||||||
| Written in | German | |||||
| Involved Special Programs |
Bladder -> SBS of the Bladder Mucosa |
|||||
| Categories | Observation of a single SBS run, e.g. one PCL phase (optionally with prediction of PCL duration) Moderate to severe (cancer, paralysis, seizures, heart attack, ...) |
Description
My husband and I met at a meditation week, when we were both still married. We were both in similar circumstances, because our partners were quite happy to do without our company - we were actually alone. Independently of each other, it had also already become painfully clear to us that growing old in this dreary way was not an option. What we had tried with our partners, to grow close again, had failed.
Chance sent us to this seminar and seated us at the same large round table, but never together. On the first day I suffered from migraine and withdrew after lunch, which my husband already took note of with regret at the time. When I felt better the next day, he looked after me, was attentive, and I enjoyed his company. Neither of us had anything to give away for free. To finally have someone again who was interested in you, with whom you could talk about anything under the sun, who felt so strangely familiar and somehow similar to one's own nature, impressed us both. When my now-husband - himself astonished afterwards - spontaneously blurted out on the 3rd day already, asking whether I could imagine living with him, I wasn't even particularly astonished. I thought about it briefly, said that I probably still ought to know a few things... - „well, yes!“
And from then on everything took on a life of its own, even though I was married in Switzerland, had a 17-year-old son and was working - and he lived in Germany with his family - albeit with one child who had already moved out and one who was nearly grown up.
After one of the frequent, exhausting arguments picked out of thin air, he therefore did not smooth things over for once, but instead told his then often moody wife that he would spare her the fighting and move out.
I too settled everything, had my son's blessing for it, quit my job and emigrated. In a small 40 m² apartment we were simply happy, without much in the way of possessions.
While I had managed to carry out the separation decently and mostly respectfully, which also made later friendly contact possible, his ex-wife suddenly became combative, would have liked to do everything better after all and turn back the clock, and accordingly she often interfered in our life. There were calls that got hung up on whenever I was the one who answered. She had matters where she urgently HAD to see him - and she managed to arrange important meetings „because of the children“. An ugly, manipulative game against me, though I wasn't fully aware of it at the time.
At some point I noticed how hard it had become for me to deal with the need to go to the toilet without stress while on the road. Meanwhile, by then married, we were traveling across Europe in the truck, and it could happen that, just as we arrived at a rest stop, a bus would also release its human cargo toward the rest-stop building. Dreadful, having to then wait on tenterhooks for the toilets. This urge to go to the toilet would often set in like a sudden ambush. So sometimes there was nothing for it but, for example while shopping in supermarkets, to crouch down for a while and strainedly search for something on the lowest shelf, until the
worst of the urge had passed and I could make it to the store's restroom. Really quite a nuisance.
Still, I didn't give it any further thought. I had already known this for a while from slightly older female acquaintances - who, similarly afflicted in the past, would sometimes rush to the toilets as a group. It didn't affect me back then, and I simply registered that at a certain age that might just be how it is. Advertising, after all, addressed this topic quite intrusively too.
It was never so bad that I would have had to wear incontinence pads. The practical panty liners I used anyway - especially given the limited comfort while traveling - were sufficient.
And then suddenly everything was different. I noticed that urinating took a bit longer, because the stream was a bit thinner. I was „watertight“ again and could choose whether to go to the toilet right away - or only in 4 hours. Brilliant. But then, one day at home in the bathtub, I felt a growth about 2 to 3 cm in size, which was apparently causing this change. At first I was frightened. And of course thoughts of „cancer“ shoot through your mind - especially given how burdened my family has been by it. But nonsense!
And I began to think it over. The bathtub, with paper and pen at its edge, had already helped me solve many such puzzles before.
What had so suddenly changed? Then it became clear to me. My husband's ex-wife had gotten married!!!! Finally. And I also remembered a conclusive story I had once heard at the Hamer regulars' table, which explained a lot. Namely, that a cat, through whose territory a strange, different female cat often roams, biologically-sensibly begins to lose urine through atrophy of the mucous membranes, thereby unconsciously marking her territory without any deliberate action. And that was exactly what had happened to me. Only not over a few days or a week - but over a minimum of two years. That the repair, i.e. the healing, would overshoot was absolutely logical.
What a relief - and on top of that, what luck that my husband didn't put me under pressure, because sexual intercourse wasn't possible with this. The growth was too big for that, which would have been painful. As it was, though, I felt nothing and had no complaints at all.
What madness it would have been if I had gone to the doctor, possibly let myself be frightened, and then, under pressure, maybe had something snipped away? There's always the question, too, of whether such an operation even works. Would I have received treatment - including medication - that I would never have wanted?
And risk this ability to decide when I WANT to go to the toilet? Never! We were still traveling in the truck, and I was overjoyed about my new freedom.
How did it continue? - After the calmly calculated roughly 2-3 years, the growth had indeed simply disappeared again. Thank you, Dr. Hamer.
Note from Ingmar Marquardt
Thank you for this exciting report. A whole series of special programs were involved here:
- "Urine comes out in drips":
This happens when one of the bladder sphincter muscles is in the conflict-active phase and does not close properly. Based on the theme described, this would fit well with the SBS of the innervation of the external bladder sphincter. The conflict content is a "motor territorial-marking conflict", i.e. "I know where I can and may mark, but I can't manage to enforce my right" - so it's about drawing boundaries with a lack of ability to enforce them. In the conflict-active phase there is a reduction in function, as a result of which the muscle doesn't close one hundred percent and urine drips out here.
- "Sudden, ambush-like urge to urinate":
Either in pcl-A of the endodermal kidney collecting tubules (refugee conflict in resolution), because the bladder simply fills up very quickly, or in pcl-A of the ectodermal bladder mucosa, which - belonging to the outer skin schema - suddenly becomes hypersensitive. I'd guess the latter, because after her husband's ex-wife got married, she was able, due to normal sensitivity, to choose again to go to the toilet only hours later - and because the theme of territorial marking fits exactly with the situation described.
- "Growth at the outer end of the urethra":
A clear tissue assignment is not possible here due to lack of information. The ectodermal mucosa can be ruled out, since it does not cause a large space-occupying mass but instead strong, burning pain in the post-conflictolytic phase, which did not occur here.
Possible candidates would be swellings of blood vessels, lymph nodes, connective tissue, or the corium.
Since the regression took several years, this strongly suggests that there were still recurrences for quite a while regarding the passing of urine or the underlying conflict theme.
Final note on the regulars'-table story:
An atrophy of the mucosa accompanied by loss of urine does not exist in that form physiologically, since this is controlled by the bladder sphincter muscles, as described above regarding the drip-wise passing of urine.
Comments from Viola Heins:
The "I can't prevent the ex-wife from repeatedly intruding into our territory" could also have affected the urethra, i.e. an SWE (self-devaluation conflict) as with the sphincter muscle.
Figuratively, the urethra is the driveway into the garden. The ex-wife is (figuratively) constantly standing at the front door again (phone calls).
As I understand it, the white-matter-controlled SWE area always has to do with performance capacity and with the fact that something is moved from A to B: with bones and muscles etc. we move ourselves forward, and with vessels of all kinds, substances are moved forward within the body. All blood vessels and lymph vessels are mesodermal in their basic structure. I think this applies to all tubes, including those that carry urine. If we focus on the thin inner wall lining, the "wallpaper", it is because this is so often affected. But this alone could not represent anything by itself, just as wallpaper alone cannot replace a brick wall. Whether it is muscle or connective tissue that is affected - both are cerebral-white-matter-mesodermal. So it was not the physical contact with the woman intruding into the territory, not the direct, physical contact, that disturbed her, but the fact that she could not prevent these approach attempts. "I can't" is SWE.
If the (endodermal) mucosa reacted, the conflict could have been that she cannot hold the urine chunk and does not want to let it through. Perhaps that is even the more likely explanation; in principle a consequential conflict. And this, too, concerns her inner territory, when she does not have control over the regulation of her own body. Although that, too, is again a form of incapacity. So both tissue components of the urethra could have reacted with this conflict theme as well.
Thank you for this exciting report. A whole series of special programs were involved here:
- "Urine comes out in drips":
This happens when one of the bladder sphincter muscles is in the conflict-active phase and does not close properly. Based on the theme described, this would fit well with the SBS of the innervation of the external bladder sphincter. The conflict content is a "motor territorial-marking conflict", i.e. "I know where I can and may mark, but I can't manage to enforce my right" - so it's about drawing boundaries with a lack of ability to enforce them. In the conflict-active phase there is a reduction in function, as a result of which the muscle doesn't close one hundred percent and urine drips out here.
- "Sudden, ambush-like urge to urinate":
Either in pcl-A of the endodermal kidney collecting tubules (refugee conflict in resolution), because the bladder simply fills up very quickly, or in pcl-A of the ectodermal bladder mucosa, which - belonging to the outer skin schema - suddenly becomes hypersensitive. I'd guess the latter, because after her husband's ex-wife got married, she was able, due to normal sensitivity, to choose again to go to the toilet only hours later - and because the theme of territorial marking fits exactly with the situation described.
- "Growth at the outer end of the urethra":
A clear tissue assignment is not possible here due to lack of information. The ectodermal mucosa can be ruled out, since it does not cause a large space-occupying mass but instead strong, burning pain in the post-conflictolytic phase, which did not occur here.
Possible candidates would be swellings of blood vessels, lymph nodes, connective tissue, or the corium.
Since the regression took several years, this strongly suggests that there were still recurrences for quite a while regarding the passing of urine or the underlying conflict theme.
Final note on the regulars'-table story:
An atrophy of the mucosa accompanied by loss of urine does not exist in that form physiologically, since this is controlled by the bladder sphincter muscles, as described above regarding the drip-wise passing of urine.
Comments from Viola Heins:
The "I can't prevent the ex-wife from repeatedly intruding into our territory" could also have affected the urethra, i.e. an SWE (self-devaluation conflict) as with the sphincter muscle.
Figuratively, the urethra is the driveway into the garden. The ex-wife is (figuratively) constantly standing at the front door again (phone calls).
As I understand it, the white-matter-controlled SWE area always has to do with performance capacity and with the fact that something is moved from A to B: with bones and muscles etc. we move ourselves forward, and with vessels of all kinds, substances are moved forward within the body. All blood vessels and lymph vessels are mesodermal in their basic structure. I think this applies to all tubes, including those that carry urine. If we focus on the thin inner wall lining, the "wallpaper", it is because this is so often affected. But this alone could not represent anything by itself, just as wallpaper alone cannot replace a brick wall. Whether it is muscle or connective tissue that is affected - both are cerebral-white-matter-mesodermal. So it was not the physical contact with the woman intruding into the territory, not the direct, physical contact, that disturbed her, but the fact that she could not prevent these approach attempts. "I can't" is SWE.
If the (endodermal) mucosa reacted, the conflict could have been that she cannot hold the urine chunk and does not want to let it through. Perhaps that is even the more likely explanation; in principle a consequential conflict. And this, too, concerns her inner territory, when she does not have control over the regulation of her own body. Although that, too, is again a form of incapacity. So both tissue components of the urethra could have reacted with this conflict theme as well.
Note: Have you also had exciting experiences with the 5BL? If so, it would be great if you could send us an anonymized report so that we can publish it in the archive and everyone can benefit from your experiences. Thank you very much!


